Macau Delivers First National Security Verdict With Prison Term for Former Legislator
Taylor Walter · Nov 9, 2026

Macau Delivers First National Security Verdict With Prison Term for Former Legislator

Macau has recorded its inaugural national security case with the sentencing of former pro-democracy legislator Au Kam San to twelve years and six months in prison on charges that include subverting state power, collaborating with overseas groups to endanger national security, and breaching secrecy through the disclosure of confidential information from closed-door sessions, according to court records and related reports.
The conviction stems from activities spanning 2023 to 2024 along with a 2021 incident in which details from confidential meetings on gaming concession renewals were passed to an overseas organization, and the entire trial unfolded behind closed doors without public access to proceedings or evidence presentations.
Details of the Charges and Sentencing
Prosecutors established that Au Kam San engaged in actions that met the legal threshold for subverting state power while also working with foreign entities in ways that compromised national security interests, and the court imposed the twelve-and-a-half-year term after considering both the subversion elements and the specific breach involving leaked information from 2021 discussions on casino licensing renewals.
Those closed meetings centered on the renewal process for gaming concessions, a critical regulatory framework governing Macau's casino sector, and the leak of details from those sessions formed a core component of the secrecy violation charge that contributed to the overall sentence length.
Timeline of Events Leading to the Case
Activities under scrutiny occurred between 2023 and 2024, building on the earlier 2021 disclosure that tied directly to the gaming concession talks, and investigators connected these separate periods into a single prosecution that became Macau's first test of its national security legislation in a courtroom setting.
The case drew attention because it represented the initial use of these legal provisions against a former legislator who had served nearly two decades in the role, highlighting how authorities applied the statutes to conduct involving both domestic political activities and cross-border communications.
Closed-Door Proceedings and Public Record
Because the trial remained closed to observers and media, limited official information emerged during the hearings themselves, yet the final verdict and sentence details entered the public record through court announcements that confirmed the convictions on all three primary charges without releasing transcripts or witness statements.
Observers note that such confidentiality measures align with standard practice in national security matters, and the resulting sentence stands as the benchmark outcome for this category of case in the jurisdiction to date.

Reports from Gambling.com and additional coverage on the same platform outlined the connection between the leaked 2021 meeting contents and the overseas recipient, providing the factual backbone for the secrecy breach element that the court weighed alongside the subversion and collaboration counts.
Context Within Macau's Legal Framework
The national security provisions invoked here had not previously reached trial stage in Macau, which made this proceeding the first opportunity for courts to interpret and apply the statutes to an individual with a long legislative background, and the twelve-year-six-month term reflects the combined weight the judges assigned to the multiple offenses.
Authorities presented evidence linking the defendant's actions across the specified years to both domestic political conduct and interactions with external organizations, resulting in convictions that encompassed the full scope of the alleged conduct rather than isolated incidents.
Conclusion
The sentencing concludes Macau's first national security prosecution by establishing a precedent for how courts handle combined charges of state subversion, overseas collaboration, and secrecy breaches when they intersect with regulatory matters such as gaming concession renewals, and the closed nature of the trial ensured that only the verdict and sentence became part of the accessible public record.